【ASCO2014】错配修复状态可作为II/III期直肠癌患者预后
2014-05-27 来源:医脉通

错配修复(MMR)状态已经被确定作为结肠癌患者一种重要的预后因素。研究人员利用ACCENT数据库确定了缺失错配修复(dMMR)状态与临床/病理学特征和预后的相关性。下面和大家提前分享这项研究。


研究方法:


纳入17项试验的7803II/III期结肠癌患者,针对MLH1/MSH2/MLH6蛋白质利用微卫星不稳定性(MSI14项研究)或者免疫组织化学分析(1项研究)开展分析;其中有2项研究对两种分析都进行检测。在汇总分析中,571例患者接受单纯手术治疗;3878例患者接受5-FU单药治疗(mrx);22925-FU+奥沙利铂oxal)治疗;以及1055例接受5-FU+伊立替康iri)治疗。


MSI-高或者没有蛋白质的肿瘤被列为dMMR;剩余的被归为MMR-proficient (pMMR)。中位随访期是7年。预后包括总生存期(OS)和复发时间(TTR)。相关性分析包括纳入分析的所有患者;预后分析仅限于接受单纯手术治疗或者5-FU mrx,排除接受oxri/iri治疗患者。


研究结果:


2270II期患者有524名(23.1%),和5533III期患者有823名(14.9%)表现出dMMRMMR状态与女性性别(dMMR19% F vs 16% MP=0.004),较高的T期(dMMR11% T1/2 v 18% T3 v 21% T4P0.001),和右侧面肿瘤位置(dMMR,左9% v 27%P0.001)具有相关性。在接受单纯手术治疗的II期患者中(表),与pMMR比较,dMMR与改善的OSHR=0.27P=0.01)和TTRHR=0.27P=0.01)具有很强的关联。MMR与预后的关系在5-FU治疗的II期和III期患者中影响衰减,其显著性联系仅限于经5-FU-mrx治疗的III期患者(TTR:HR=0.80P=0.02;OS:HR=0.79P=0.02)。



研究结论:


研究人员经该研究证实,II期结肠癌患者中MMR状态具有预后价值。MMR也会影响III期患者预后,但是目前不会改变患者管理。


医脉通整理报道,转载请注明出处。


会议专题》》》2014年ASCO年会专题报道



阅读原文摘要


Prognosticimpact of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) in 7,803 stage II/III colon cancer(CC) patients (pts): A pooled individual pt data analysis of 17 adjuvant trialsin the ACCENT database.(Abstract3507


Authors: Daniel J.Sargent, Qian Shi, Greg Yothers, et al.


Session Type: General Poster Session


Background: MMR status has been established as an important prognostic factor in CC pts. We determined the association of dMMR status with clinical/pathological features and prognosis using the ACCENT database. 


Methods: Microsatellite instability (MSI, 14 studies) or immunohistochemical analysis (1 study) for MLH1/MSH2/MLH6 proteins was performed on 7,803 stage II/III pts enrolled in 17 trials; 2 studies tested both. 571 pts received surgery alone; 3,878 5FU monotherapy (mrx); 2,299 5FU+oxaliplatin (oxal); and 1,055 5-FU+irinotecan (iri). Tumors with MSI-high or an absent protein were classified as dMMR; remainder were MMR-proficient (pMMR). Median follow-up was 7 years. Outcomes included overall survival (OS) and time to recurrence (TTR). Correlation analyses included all pts; prognostic analyses were limited to pts receiving surgery alone or 5FU mrx excluding pts receiving oxal/iri. 


Results: 524 (23.1%) of 2,270 stage II and 823 (14.9%) of 5,533 stage III pts exhibited dMMR. MMR status was associated with female sex (dMMR, 19% F v 16% M, p=0.004), higher T stage (dMMR, 11% T1/2 v 18% T3 v 21% T4, p < 0.001), and right-sided tumor location (dMMR, left 9% v right 27%, p < 0.001). Compared to pMMR, dMMR was strongly associated with improved OS (HR=0.27, p=0.01) and TTR (HR=0.27, p=0.01) in stage II pts treated with surgery alone (Table). Association of MMR was prognostic although of attenuated impact in 5FU treated stage II and in stage III pts , with significance confined to 5FU-mrx treated stage III pts (HR=0.80, p =0.02 for TTR; HR=0.79, p=0.02 for OS). 


Conclusions: Our study confirms prognostic utility of MMR status in stage II CCs. MMR also impacts outcome in stage III patients, but does not currently alter pt management.

(本网站所有内容,凡注明来源为“医脉通”,版权均归医脉通所有,未经授权,任何媒体、网站或个人不得转载,否则将追究法律责任,授权转载时须注明“来源:医脉通”。本网注明来源为其他媒体的内容为转载,转载仅作观点分享,版权归原作者所有,如有侵犯版权,请及时联系我们。)

0
收藏 分享